Yes, a common idea but so not so persuasive...
Dear Michael,
If somebody wants to keep tangible assets as a investment is a better idea to purchase pure gold, others precious metal, precious stones, petroleum barrels, iron existences or any form of physical accumulation without added value. Not to mention that in the currently crisis, a difference with others in the past, this strategy didn’t function well (all these price came down).
In the case of Portuguese Tourbillion Regulateur, the added value that comes from the master watchmakers work is definitely higher than the cost of the gold and other materials used to construct the watch. What you buy in a piece like that is the history and experience of a great brand, the advantages of mechanical knowledge, hours of fine craft master men work, the good taste and static equilibrium that comes from an artistic design that can only be possible with a huge experience. In other words, when someone buy a watch like that are paying more for intangibles factors than for the precious materials.
So, they are advertising for an artistic masterpiece and its value depends more of the buyers perception. In this case, the argument of tangible assets do not make sense.
I think that in watch lovers (well informed buyers) market, IWC made great sales of their more common and economic models just showing the iconic complication watches the brand have made for years.
Just my two cents.
Best wishes,
M