• Graduate
    26 Aug 2016, 7:37 p.m.

    i.imgur.com/CwmsR0Bl.jpg

    Saw this thread being featured on the IWC Instagram page and figured it was high time I registered – particularly after having just taken delivery of a 3290. There are lots of flavors of the AT, but I think the current iteration is the best proportioned, and the best mix of IWC's classic and modern design elements. Plus, I'm also a serial strap-changer, and the fixed bars on the 3290 gave me the best chance to wear it on more than just the factory rubber or bracelet.

    Have always been drawn to the brand – affiliation with modern ocean conservationism (which feels genuine and not a smokescreen or PR stunt), exceptional build quality, and after-sales support reputation. The latter of which, was affirmed recently upon visiting the flagship boutique in NYC. Really great folks working there, and a genuinely awesome place to start a connection with the brand.

  • Apprentice
    26 Aug 2016, 9 p.m.

    What a great shot! I wasn't sure about the silver dial until this photo...but now I'm drawn to it. The even tone of colors and high contrast has me reeled in. I liked the dark dial but wasn't sure about the mint green minutes hand, but I may just have to go for the silver version. As I go to the dealer and try them on, I'll provide some wrist shots to add to the thread. All o can contribute is text at this point.

    I didn't know they'd done programs for conservation. I've got a lot more reading and education to get on this brand. One visit to the factory/museum just doesn't do it justice. And really, it's the people and customers that are giving IWC such a favorable light for me.

  • Graduate
    26 Aug 2016, 10 p.m.

    Not an Aquatimer per se, but significant to later AT models.

    i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa54/mckaleta/Mobile%20Uploads/image_zps1rct1lpp.jpeg

  • Graduate
    27 Aug 2016, 12:12 a.m.

    Here's a better shot of the silver dial, and it's probably worth mentioning that the previous gen AT 2000 had a matte white dial, whereas this is definitely more silver. Lume ain't quite as good, but it plays with the light in more interesting ways, and I'd argue that the dial elements are a little more original here.

    i.imgur.com/J25IwFAl.jpg

  • Master
    27 Aug 2016, 1:04 a.m.

    very well-said. This too was my favorite watch of the new Aquatimer series, believe it or not. The silver dial is beautiful! understated yet good to look at. I agree... there are so many things about this latest series of Aquatimer that make it appealing.

    have you seen the new jacques cousteau auto? Its dial is even better looking than the silver one. if I were to choose between the two, I would be pretty torned.

  • Graduate
    27 Aug 2016, 1:39 a.m.

    haha Yeah, I have – in fact, the Cousteau was the original plan (been jonsing for a blue dial), but my impatience got the better of me and I sprung for the silver instead. Don't regret it one bit!

  • Master
    27 Aug 2016, 9:24 p.m.

    I have just two Aquatimers. Both rated at 2000m. Diver watches are for diving and tend to be reasonably water-protected. I like the Sea Dweller and the 50 Fathoms but for me it has to be an AT 2000m.

    img.photobucket.com/albums/v281/RAVE54/L1040009copy.jpg

    img.photobucket.com/albums/v281/RAVE54/Mobile%20Uploads/2016-03/5E417A26-D6B1-4C79-BE82-E326A0A4209B_zpsrgxf5frm.jpg

  • Master
    29 Aug 2016, 12:57 a.m.

    Welcome Spin_Transistor. What a wonderful Bund
    Great to see you here :o)

  • Apprentice
    29 Aug 2016, 8:50 a.m.

    I do swim quite a bit, so water resistance is important. Granted, 2000m is a bit of a stretch for my current skill level, but the robustness of the case and it's ability to withstand swimming, jet-skiing, showering, etc. is definitely something I take into consideration. Also, desk diving is something that happens for me quite often, which I'm sure is not unique to the demographic of owners of the AT. Nobody has voiced a complaint about owning one thus far so, I'm not swayed against pursuing one of these watches.