IWC Schaffhausen
Collectors
Forum
  • Categories

  • New to the forum
  • Collector Articles
  • News
  • Community
  • Moderator articles
  • Contemporary timepieces
  • Movements and technical details
  • Vintage timepieces
  • About IWC
  • Gallery
  • Archive

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Weibo
  • Home
  • Archive
  • Ceramic da Vinci, anyone...?
  1. Threads
  2. Archive
chevron_left Archive

Ceramic da Vinci, anyone...?

  • forum 18 replies
  • last reply by RAVE 19 Jan 2010
  • Last
  • link
    Ross Baverstock
    Master 803 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 5:50 a.m. 19 Jan 2010, 5:50 a.m.
    link

    The Novelties section has been updated.

    The ceramic da Vinci looks really cool, I think. I love the 3D dial.

    Ross

  • link
    deleted37223
    Apprentice 0 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 6:50 a.m. 19 Jan 2010, 6:50 a.m.
    link

    This post is hidden. You cannot not see its contents.

    Hidden by on 8 Nov 2018, 3:54 p.m..

  • link
    Mr. Francis See
    Insider 94 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 5:55 a.m. 19 Jan 2010, 5:55 a.m.
    link

    A definite winner!

    I wonder how scratch resistant is polish grade 5 titanium?

  • link
    Kee Siew Tan
    Master 666 posts
    18 Jan 2010, 7:20 p.m. 18 Jan 2010, 7:20 p.m.
    link

    Nice combo of titanium & ceramic

    Hopefully it is a normal production.:)

    Rgds
    ks

  • link
    Mr. David Ter Molen
    Master 982 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 2:20 a.m. 19 Jan 2010, 2:20 a.m.
    link

    Oh my! That is really amazing

    Perfect harmony of the Da Vinci case design, ceramic and titanium, and a bold design. Well done IWC

  • link
    David P.
    Master 579 posts
    18 Jan 2010, 4:35 p.m. 18 Jan 2010, 4:35 p.m.
    link

    Drop-dead gorgeous...

    Perfect combination a technical, functional appearance, and elegance.

    Like HiFi, I'm a little worried about the scratch-resistance of the polished titanium bezel. But I guess that just means we'll each have to order a couple of spare bezels. ,-}

    Can't wait to try this one on the wrist.

    David

  • link
    Richard Sheridan
    Master 4181 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 8:30 a.m. 19 Jan 2010, 8:30 a.m.
    link

    Yes, Please...

    That is a great-looking watch. Love the dial, incredible.

    Wonder why the polished titanium bezel?

    What would be wrong with a ceramic/ZirOx bezel? Are there technical reasons?

  • link
    Joseph White
    Master 1648 posts
    18 Jan 2010, 7:55 p.m. 18 Jan 2010, 7:55 p.m.
    link

    "Very Sharp" Another IWC Winner......(nt)

  • link
    Mr.
    Apprentice 0 posts
    18 Jan 2010, 7:05 p.m. 18 Jan 2010, 7:05 p.m.
    link

    Great design...I'm tempted, but...

    unfortunately the case dimensions have grown to the size of the case of the digital-date DV version, which is really large!
    Urs

  • link
    Nicky
    Master 2085 posts
    18 Jan 2010, 7:40 p.m. 18 Jan 2010, 7:40 p.m.
    link

    Pretty cool looking DV! >>

    I would not worry about too much the Ti. I had a JLC Ti watch with polished parts in the bracelet and it was very strong, looked like steel but it was actually better.

  • link
    Paul Bloemen
    Master 4219 posts
    18 Jan 2010, 8:50 p.m. 18 Jan 2010, 8:50 p.m.
    link

    Very beautiful

    As mentioned above, this is for me the first time the Da Vinci shows some unity in design, it looks fantastic. It is just a pity that only real big men can wear it, I would feel quite uncomfortable, even a bit foolish with this size. Like, that I had to prove something by wearing a big watch.

    Kind regards,
    Paul, wearing, as promised, rose gold Saint Exupéry Chrono

  • link
    Tilo
    Master 3262 posts
    18 Jan 2010, 7:10 p.m. 18 Jan 2010, 7:10 p.m.
    link

    Damn this one's really cool!

    I just had a little view on it and I'm deeply amazed. It adds sportyness and ruggedness to this elegant watch. It has a completely new aura.
    I just love it.
    Tilo

  • link
    Evan Nanos
    Master 652 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 9:40 a.m. 19 Jan 2010, 9:40 a.m.
    link

    Simply outstanding...

    I've been staring at this one for a while and I'm still speechless!
    Some difficult decisions :)

    Cheers,
    Evan

  • link
    Larry Seiden
    Master 1243 posts
    18 Jan 2010, 10:05 p.m. 18 Jan 2010, 10:05 p.m.
    link

    WINNER! I'm going to have to have it!

    LARRY

  • link
    Richard Sheridan
    Master 4181 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 8 p.m. 19 Jan 2010, 8 p.m.
    link

    ...I Can't stop looking at the photos of this one!

  • link
    Dirk Janssen
    Master 761 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 11:10 a.m. 19 Jan 2010, 11:10 a.m.
    link

    Great design, very attractive watch

    The first of the tonneau-shaped da Vincis that appeals to me.

    I believe I would have preferred if the "Da Vinci" at the top and the "Chronograph" had been left of the face of the watch but that is a minor flaw.

    I also need to get used to the size, in particular if as "Stz" pointed out above the case is larger than the regular da Vinci chronograph.

    Dirk

  • link
    Dirk Janssen
    Master 761 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 4:35 p.m. 19 Jan 2010, 4:35 p.m.
    link

    Tempting indeed, but ...

    ... the case is truly enormous at 44 x 52.8 mm - larger than the not exactly petite regular Da Vinci Chronograph case, which has dimensions of 43.1 x 51 mm.

    Dirk

  • link
    Michael Friedberg
    Connoisseur 11468 posts
    20 Jan 2010, 4:30 a.m. 20 Jan 2010, 4:30 a.m.
    link

    not only is the case larger, but.....

    ....the price is roughly 2000 USD (or equivalent) more than the Da Vinci. Also, when compared to the CF Da Vinci, which includes also a bracelet --about a 2300 value-- the list price difference is around 4600 USD more depending on currency/country. That's a huge premium for a dial and case frame.

    I like the watch --really. But having thought about it, it has a non-IWC "Richard MIlle Me-Too" dial and I'm more of a traditionalist, even in the context of a Da Vinci. I do find it a good looking watch, but I sometimes think we need to evaluate it as an economic item in the marketplace.

    That said, one journalist commented that it is a bargain compared to a Richard Mille and competes in price with some other high-end Audemars chronos. And even if not consistent with anything else from IWC, I do like its looks too.

    Regards,
    Michael

  • link
    Rave
    Master 3148 posts
    19 Jan 2010, 3:20 p.m. 19 Jan 2010, 3:20 p.m.
    link

    Suspect reasons to buy one. Part 2

    Agreed. At 10% of the price of a RM, it is an absolute gift. And there's none of that faux carbon fibre nonsense. Probus scafusia in ceramic and titanium.

There are no more posts in this thread.

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Weibo
Contact Our Concierge
  • Contact Us
  • +1-800-432-9330
Go to iwc.com
  • Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use