Hi guys,
what's your opinion between these two models?
Apart from size and price, do you have any suggestions-comments?
Which cal is better in terms of durability services etc..
Thank you in advance
Hi guys,
what's your opinion between these two models?
Apart from size and price, do you have any suggestions-comments?
Which cal is better in terms of durability services etc..
Thank you in advance
Hi Dimitris!
So you're hunting for a fliegerchrono. Calibres between the models you mention are quite similar, there's a big difference given by the rattrappante module, this is a fascinating story itself, the name of the watchmaker who created it almost a legend right now.
Here's an interesting link to an interview our Michael had with him:
Richard Habring interviewed by Michael Friedberg
I'm not saying one watch is better than the other, I'm simply amazed by the story behind the rattrappante solution.
Thank you Rob, quite interesting post.
I love this part and the pic. talk about exacting standards and pioneering standards...
I recently acquired the 379901, and opted for it over the 378901 simply because of the aesthetic quality of the third push button - all my timepieces are either in a precious metal or have what I feel a more unique button/lug/casing design as opposed to the standard chronograph push buttons. I don't have any occasion to use the rattrapante at all given my line of work (sitting in any office), but I could not resist the design.
Both cermaic dopplechrono (did I use it correctly?) are wonderful - I love the tri-date and the red/white juxta-positioning on the dial. either way I don't think u will go wrong.
thank you