IWC Aquatimer Chronograph IW376704

I just picked up my third IWC and this time went with the orange and blue dial chrono. It was a tough choice between the new Aquatimer's or the older 2009 models but the quality really set this one apart! I feel like the new models are not as well put together and overall really really like this besel over inner one on the newer watches. What are your thoughts on the older vs newer models?

I think the new Aqua timers have stellar build quality and I really like the new internal rotating bezel. Having said that, I have the older model Cousteau and I lovw that. Both are good.

Thingy at 9 bugs me so I prefer the 3767 series, plus both height and weight is more tolerable. Prefer the newer bracelet and dial design though. A micro-adjust clasp could pull the trigger.
(Not to forget about the 3719 with its wearable size and weight...)

I wonder if it is the feel of the bezel that you prefer? I do love the sapphire bezel of the 3767 and the lume is terrific! The extra seals needed for the bezel sliding clutch mechanism of the current generation may be something to be consider if you plan on serious diving - but then you would probably want a 2000 meter model and I do really like the new 2000! I've become a little more paranoid about seals on dive watches and feel the less pushers, crowns, etc. the better. That being said, I have played with the chronograph on my 3769 at 120 feet and it worked just fine - although I wouldn't do it again!

Congratulation on you new acquisition! Its a beautiful watch. Do share some pictures with us.

I would not consider the latest generation AT's to be of a lesser build quality. IMHO All of the three generations of ATs (from a bezel point of view) had their inherent pros and cons. I believe IWC tried to rectify the shortcomings of each, and since there is no perfect solution in engineering, only trade-offs, something new popped up with each new generation.

Gen one's inner bezel bezel: PRO = cleaner design with inner bezel with no chance of accidentally rotating it as the crown got disengaged underwater; CON = Turning the bezel could be a challenge for someone wearing gloves

Gen two's bezel: PRO = IWC made it easier to rotate external bezel through a conventional bezel design with sapphire disk lumed on the underside to prevent scratches; CON = You could rotate the bezel accidently, unlike the earlier generation (this was the trade-off!)

Gen three (current): PRO = IWC’s SafeDive system that can be controlled like a conventional external bezel design (but rotates an inner bezel) with the added functionality that will prevent accidental rotation while at the same time making it easier to rotate the bezel unlike the first generation ATs; CON = the thing at 9’o clock may not be adding to the aesthetics according to some of us (this was the trade-off!).

That said, I second your view on the earlier generation AT's - I think a simple rotating external bezel is the best trade-off while at the same time looking really good! If IWC could make the 9’o clock mechanism a little more inconspicuous (and I do not know if this is possible), while at the same time retaining the SafeDive’s wonderful functionality, it would make for a stellar package.

Just my 2 cents

Sumit

I know its a dive watch but I never really take any of mine into a pool. I feel its too risky and since I do not dive its a risk not worth taking although I am sure the watch would be just find. I like the 44mm size over the 42mm of the newer model as well. Overall this watch is spot on and I am enjoying wearing it. The day date feature is awesome as well!