"I am curious why, if this is a known movement
feature it wasn't in the customer service system."
I suspect IWC felt this "movement feature," which I see as more of a quirk in
the design, did not offer a positive enhancement to an owner's enjoyment of
the watch. Perhaps IWC felt the occurrences would be minimal, and that it
would not upset owners the few times that most owners would experience it.
Now that you have expressed your disappointment with the movement to an
audience of IWC admirers, I am curious what it is you hope to accomplish with
your revelation of the issue and your dissatisfaction with it? Are you hoping
for IWC to redesign the movement to appease those who are unhappy with the way
it occasionally happens? Are you trying to dissuade people from buying an IWC?
I get the feeling from your repeated entries here that you have some kind of
agenda to fulfill, and perhaps I should "unsubscribe." On the other hand, I
respect and acknowledge that there may be something worth learning here that I
just haven't yet grasped.