• Master
    17 Feb 2022, 5:09 p.m.

    A while back I located and secured what I believed to be a fairly old (1890's)
    pocket watch in the UK.

    This movement has the serial number of 156765.

    Using the Date your IWC utility this shows as a Calibre 53 from 1897.

    But this is definately NOT a calibre 53

    A Calibre 53 movement looks like this.

    I looked through all my data and pictures here, and could not place it.
    Neither is the movement listed in IWC Fournitures No. 7

    So I reached out to Tonny, saying I had a movement that looked like a Cal. 57
    Americaine but then in mirror image.

    So I asked our forum moderator - could this be something I don't have in my
    collection? He said look it's a Cal. 56 like mine and sent a picture.

    Here is his Cal. 56 side by side with mine. In the photo although not
    vissible, the stem are both orientated upwords.

    So my c.56 on the left and Tonnys C.56 is on the right hand side here.Clearly
    not the same - no?

    flic.kr/p/2n4bh1m

    So, the question to you all then, which one of us has a C.56 and if one of
    these is a C.56 - then what is the other movement.

    Maybe one of the 3 wise men will answer this riddle.

  • Master
    17 Feb 2022, 6:02 p.m.

    A true puzzler indeed.
    I'm looking forward to reading of the adventure this one leads us on

  • Master
    17 Feb 2022, 7 p.m.

    who oh who has a C.56.

    I say I do ... On the basis of this fact sheet here below.

    So if mine is a C.56 then what is Tonny's ??????

  • Master
    17 Feb 2022, 7:49 p.m.

    Ahh Tonny, but this picture is no riddle - one of your two shown pieces
    labeled Calibre 57 is in fact a so called C.57 Americain.

    A known naming convention for this movement.

    Here's mine.

  • Connoisseur
    17 Feb 2022, 10:05 p.m.

    Dear Mark,

    I don't know, who the three wise men are, you refer to. But the movement you
    show in your post starting this thread is a Cal. 57 in the old design, dating
    from the mid to late 1890s.

    There are four versions of the Cal. pair 56/58: Lepine (balance about 3 or 9)
    and Savonnette (balance at six o'clock) in the new design with three screws on
    the winding wheel and in the old design with two central screws on the winding
    wheels.

    Your movement has the two central screws on the winding wheel, is therefore
    the old version. And it has the balance not at six, so a Lepine, so in terms
    of calibre numbers a Cal. 57.

    This calibre was pretty common for the UK market served by Stauffer, so no
    wonder it bears the Stauffer trademark.

    Best regards

    Thomas

  • Master
    17 Feb 2022, 10:24 p.m.

    Many thanks for your detailed responce Thomas.

    Do you have a picture of a "true" Cal.56 movement that you could share.

  • Master
    18 Feb 2022, 12:36 a.m.

    The one on the right looks like the C. 56 to me.

  • Connoisseur
    18 Feb 2022, 8:25 a.m.

    Dear all,

    Cal. 56 is an ambiguous designation. Since the 1890s with alle calibre pairs
    the lower number is the lepine, the higher number the savonnette, e.g. Cal. 52
    Lepine, Cal. 53 Savonnette, Cal. 71 Lepine, Cal. 72 Savonnette.

    With the Cal. 57 Lepine and its Savonnette twin the situation is a little bit
    different. In the very early times of this calibre pair the Savonnette was
    designated Cal. 56, but after some time renamed Cal. 58.

    All the savonnettes in this thread are from the era they already figured as
    Cal. 58. And indeed: If the crown is in the 12 o'clock position and the
    balance in the 6 o'clock position it is a savonnette, so some calibres 58 in
    this thread.

    Regards

    Th. Koenig

  • Master
    6 Apr 2022, 9:32 p.m.

    The Serie 156'601 to 157'200 is one of the entries in the Tolke list which is
    wrong. This are c.57 19 lig (Mod. 1894)

    regards

    Ralph

    An other sample of the same movement (but of a later serie 187'705)