I guess the question is - what causes SuperLuminova to decay over time, if at all...
from an earlier post:
i think this was Michael's response: www.iwc.com/forum/en/discussion/1589/
"Super-LumiNova® vs. tritium
Science wasn't my best subject at school, so I stand to be corrected here by our chemists and physicists.
However, it is my understanding that Super-LumiNova® doesn't have a life (it continues indefinitely) and is not radioactive, but it does have to be "charged" by light to be activated, will not glow as long as tritium after a charge, and can appear green-ish. However, it can be much brighter than tritium --which for some people is great and to others is an unnecessary distraction.
Super-LumiNova® is a relatively new development and is made of photoluminescent crystals (anorganic pigments) which operate like a "light battery". Foreign atoms built into the crystals act as activation, storage and luminous centers.. The more intensive and the longer the activation or "charging" lasts, the more electrons are lifted up. After a storage phase these electrons fall back to the ground level and emit the energy loss in form of visible light
Super-LumiNova® pigments are free of any radioactive substances. After sufficient activation by sunlight or artificial light Super-LumiNova® crystals emit light in the dark and remain visible for an entire night. This activation and subsequent light emission process can be repeated indefinitely, and the material does not suffer any aging.
Tritium, on the other hand, is an unstable isotope of hydrogen. Tritium’s half life is approximately 12.3 years and it decays at a rate of approximately 5.5 percent per year (very technically, every year 5.5% of the parent H3 (Tritium) decays into the daughter He3 (Helium-3)). This is why watch dials and hands using tritium “wear out”.
It is my understanding this this decay causes phosphor to "excite", producing luminesence. While as a practical matter this can be safe, in extremely large quantities or if ingested, tritium is considered a carcinogen.
There's advantages to both, but I suspect tritium will be soon be gone...not just for iWC, but generally."
I have read at various watch forums too that there is 'no sufficient data that Superluminova decays over time" or the like...