IWC Schaffhausen
Collectors
Forum
  • Categories

  • New to the forum
  • Collector Articles
  • News
  • Community
  • Moderator articles
  • Contemporary timepieces
  • Movements and technical details
  • Vintage timepieces
  • About IWC
  • Gallery
  • Archive

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Weibo
  • Home
  • Movements and technical details
  • The accuracy of cal. 80110/80111
  1. Threads
  2. Movements and technical details
chevron_left Movements and technical details

The accuracy of cal. 80110/80111

  • forum 7 replies
  • last reply by RAVE 17 Feb 2013
  • Last
  • link
    Roman Belov
    Master 844 posts
    17 Feb 2013, 5:40 a.m. 17 Feb 2013, 5:40 a.m.
    link

    I was told by few my friends who use Inge's with 80110 and 80111 inside and all said the watches are very accurate. Yesterday I checked 2 my watches - 3227 Ken Noguchi and Vintahe Inge Laureus. It's the same for my watches as well. Actually in different positions the accuracy was from -3 to +3, but at the photos I very easy catched 0:

    i562.photobucket.com/albums/ss67/rc30/f8131606-51e3-4737-9ff4-50cfd75f4340_zps0a43fb81.jpg

    i562.photobucket.com/albums/ss67/rc30/cfe8f856-f680-41f3-b88f-bda49c8b4149_zpsc5618d05.jpg

    What about your watches? Do you check it?

  • link
    8541
    Master 4485 posts
    17 Feb 2013, 10:15 a.m. 17 Feb 2013, 10:15 a.m.
    link

    Excelent post Roman. People sometimes tend to forget (in this day and age of quartz) that we have to do here with mass produced 100% mechanical movements.

    That we can (should) accept a variance of up to +/- 7 seconds a day - does not mean, that many of our watches are far more Accurate than that.

  • link
    Cinq
    Master 5431 posts
    17 Feb 2013, 11:16 a.m. 17 Feb 2013, 11:16 a.m.
    link

    Magnificent result Roman. Unfortunately I don't have the tools to check my watches but I do compare them to the atomic clock sometimes. My Inge 322701 looses a few seconds per day but I am still very happy with it.

    Kind regards,

    Clemens

  • link
    Mr. David Mathias
    Master 980 posts
    17 Feb 2013, 3:43 p.m. 17 Feb 2013, 3:43 p.m.
    link

    Hi Roman. I don't currently have an 80111 but did have one in the VC AT that is no longer with me. It ran magnificently -- fast by less than 1 sec/day. It's a great movement in my opinion.

  • link
    Bill B.
    Master 6725 posts
    17 Feb 2013, 5:08 p.m. 17 Feb 2013, 5:08 p.m.
    link

    My 3227 is one of, if not the most, accurate and consistent time keepers.

  • link
    Mr.
    Apprentice 0 posts
    17 Feb 2013, 7:08 p.m. 17 Feb 2013, 7:08 p.m.
    link

    Frankly, I do not pay attention to the accuracy anymore. I am also not worried becasuse I know, when it's really needed, to regulate the watch. That's the beauty of mechanical watches. So I enjoy the watch and don't bother about accuracy.

    But.. you've got an impressive result and that must be comforting!

    Peter

  • link
    Bill B.
    Master 6725 posts
    17 Feb 2013, 7:28 p.m. 17 Feb 2013, 7:28 p.m.
    link
    PN has written:

    Frankly, I do not pay attention to the accuracy anymore. I am also not worried becasuse I know, when it's really needed, to regulate the watch. That's the beauty of mechanical watches. So I enjoy the watch and don't bother about accuracy.

    But.. you've got an impressive result and that must be comforting!

    Peter

    Peter,

    I concur. I don't check accuracy unless I suspect an issue and need to give my service person some guidance for a tune-up.

  • link
    Rave
    Master 3148 posts
    17 Feb 2013, 10:36 p.m. 17 Feb 2013, 10:36 p.m.
    link

    The date is spot on until I get to the 1st March :-)

    Otherwise, my 80110 movements are only bettered by my 853 and 854 movements. That's progress for you.

There are no more posts in this thread.

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Weibo
Contact Our Concierge
  • Contact Us
  • +1-800-432-9330
Go to iwc.com
  • Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use