IWC Schaffhausen
Collectors
Forum
  • Categories

  • New to the forum
  • Collector Articles
  • News
  • Community
  • Moderator articles
  • Contemporary timepieces
  • Movements and technical details
  • Vintage timepieces
  • About IWC
  • Gallery
  • Archive

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Weibo
  • Home
  • Community
  • Vintage Aquatimer in for regulation
  1. Threads
  2. Community
chevron_left Community

Vintage Aquatimer in for regulation

  • forum 7 replies
  • last reply by dmath 6 Jan 2013
  • Last
  • link
    Jez4
    Insider 81 posts
    18 Nov 2012, 2:04 p.m. 18 Nov 2012, 2:04 p.m.
    link

    So, my beloved VC AT has gone in for regulation. It has been running a very consistent +12 seconds per day. I think the movement must be solid to be so consistent, but +12 is outside IWC tolerances and, as it is only 15 months old, should be capable of better. I put it off for ages, but eventually decided the time had come.

    I've found a couple of threads in the archives which suggest almost spot on accuracy. Anyone have any experience of the 80111? Am I right to expect better accuracy?
    Jez

  • link
    Mr. David Mathias
    Master 980 posts
    18 Nov 2012, 2:23 p.m. 18 Nov 2012, 2:23 p.m.
    link

    Yes, that movement is capable of much better. Mine is right around +1 per day, it's my most accurate watch. I'm sure they'll get yours within tolerances and then you'll love it even more. Good luck with the wait.

  • link
    Mr. andy stevens
    Master 1792 posts
    18 Nov 2012, 9:56 p.m. 18 Nov 2012, 9:56 p.m.
    link

    I echo David's comments. I believe both David's VC-AT and mine were produced in the same batch ( although I had to wait for the U.S. allocations to be delivered much later ) but the accuracy is identical.

    The 80111 has proven to be a constant just like the ETA 2892/A2 in my Mark XVI, both robust movements with pinpoint accuracy.

    With a little tweaking, yours will be just fine. God's speed in it's travels.

    Andy

  • link
    Jez4
    Insider 81 posts
    18 Nov 2012, 10:20 p.m. 18 Nov 2012, 10:20 p.m.
    link

    Thanks guys, that sets my mind at rest. Sounds like it may well be worth the (ridiculously long) wait!

    Regards,
    Jez

  • link
    8541
    Master 4485 posts
    18 Nov 2012, 10:28 p.m. 18 Nov 2012, 10:28 p.m.
    link

    Jez, my VC AT has consistently run at +2 seconds per day. So Yes, that movement can and will bring in better timings after regulation.

    Giovanni, who too has the VC AT found his to be running to fast as well, and has like you sent it off for a service.

    Let us know the results, when you get it back.

  • link
    Jez4
    Insider 81 posts
    5 Jan 2013, 8:03 p.m. 5 Jan 2013, 8:03 p.m.
    link

    Update! My VC AT arrived back from RIS London after three and a half weeks, which seemed pretty good. Complete service and regulation under warranty,now running at < -1 seconds a day - I've tested it over the past couple of weeks.

    We often read posts about poor service from major watch brands, but I must say I think IWC have done a great job. Very happy, and, of course, it hasn't left my wrist since!

    Jez

  • link
    Cinq
    Master 5431 posts
    6 Jan 2013, 7:58 p.m. 6 Jan 2013, 7:58 p.m.
    link

    That's wonderful news! Thanks for the update and continue to enjoy this beauty!

    Kind regards,

    Clemens

  • link
    Mr. David Mathias
    Master 980 posts
    6 Jan 2013, 9:01 p.m. 6 Jan 2013, 9:01 p.m.
    link

    That's an excellent result. Congratulations and enjoy.

There are no more posts in this thread.

Follow Us

  • Facebook
  • X (Twitter)
  • Pinterest
  • LinkedIn
  • Weibo
Contact Our Concierge
  • Contact Us
  • +1-800-432-9330
Go to iwc.com
  • Conditions of Sale
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Use