• Master
    23 Dec 2013, 4:17 p.m.

    As indicated before, I am interested in the Worldtimer and its complication. I wonder what the differences are with the previous UTC complication: are there any differences, apart from the dial layout? It could be possible, I guess, that the second time zone indicator of the UTC was replaced by the turning 24 hours ring of the Worldtimer, in effect "only" enlarging the window of the UTC. Until now I never was able to handle the Worldtimer, to try it on my wrist. Sometimes love to a watch comes slowly...

    Kind regards,
    Paul

  • Master
    24 Dec 2013, 11:26 a.m.

    i269.photobucket.com/albums/jj79/BloemenPA/null_zpsd84c57b9.jpgi269.photobucket.com/albums/jj79/BloemenPA/null_zps3092e15d.jpg

    Here you see two pictures of the two watches, taken from the internet. Some curious information, no coincidence I guess: the Worldtimer has reference 3262, the Saint Exupéry UTC has reference 3261. Does anybody, an IWC-insider who reads the forum maybe, has some answer to my question? This would be greatly appreciated!

    Kind regards,
    Paul

  • Master
    25 Dec 2013, 4:55 p.m.

    What a bad witness I would make in court, in danger of perjuring myself unintentionally. I spent a few hours reading about all the posts on the Worldtimer here, and I noticed I wrote some of them myself!

    To conclude: the Worldtimer, ref. 3262, uses movement 30750, the last UTC, ref. 3261, uses movement 37526. The 30750 is derived from the 37526, only minor changes were necessary to accomodate the 24 hours ring. Proven technology!

    For those interested, the information on the Worldtimer in the Collection section of this site provides a product manual on the watch. It is interesting to read how to set it, it shows how it operates too. At first sight it seems strange but after some thought it makes perfectly sense. In crown position 2 the 24 hours ring and the minutes hand are set while the watch is stopped. In crown position 1 the hours hand and the date are set while the watch keeps on running. The latter makes it very easy to set the local time when travelling, whether east or west, crossing the date line forwards or backwards. It also makes it easy to change local time because of daylight saving time ("summer time"). Great, and interesting. The only practical slight disadvantage is that setting time and certainly date takes a bit more time when you let the watch run out for more than a few days. But operating the watch in that case must be a treat too.

    After its announcement the Worldtimer got quite some attention here. Some people, not longer active, bought the watch. After the initial interest it became quiet around the Worldtimer. Half a year ago this was discussed a bit, I stated that it looked nice but other watches looked nicer: I forgot until I reread. Another funny fact: about a year ago there was (still is?) some quiz to determine your fitting Pilot's watch. I participated, and stated here that I filled in the most boring but truthful answers, and that as a result "my watch" was: the Worldtimer! I forgot about that too...

    I more and more start to like the Worldtimer, the picture shown in my previous post does it justice, I guess. It looks like a true tool watch without frills, very well made, and at a size that I can still manage. The Worldtimer has quite an interesting and useful complication indeed, even if you don't travel, making you think about other places in the world. Like, when are other forum members reading the forum posts, assuming they do it in the evening? I wonder, is this watch gaining some of your interest too?

    Kind regards,
    Paul

  • Master
    25 Dec 2013, 7:54 p.m.

    Personally I am a big fan. I came very close to buying one earlier this year but went with the Ingenieur ME instead. But I nearly went with the world timer.

    It's still on my list and I may well pick one up next. I was thinking of the St Exupery Pilots Watch but it is too similar to the CF3.

    I haven't seen a single one posted here by an owner. A shame. It's a cool watch and I find it really interesting.

    Cheers,

    Jarrod

  • Connoisseur
    2 Jan 2014, 1:57 p.m.

    Paul,

    Interesting info, thx. About the worldtimer: I saw and tried it at an event organized by an AD over here and I must say I was smitten by its looks. If I was to buy a UTC like watch it would be the Worldtimer, hands down. Not sure if worldwide sales figures will confirm but when I saw it, I considered it an instant hit.

  • Connoisseur
    2 Jan 2014, 3:57 p.m.
  • Connoisseur
    20 Jan 2014, 9:52 p.m.

    Paul,
    I loved my Classic UTC... even still consider buying one again.
    I have a different brand GMT watch but to be honest it can't match the beatifully simple and classic design of the UTC.
    Good luck with your choice.

  • Master
    24 Jan 2014, 2:47 p.m.

    Hi Paul,

    As you know I like my classic UTC a lot and you already figured out they are all based on the same movement.
    Here's my watch (I like it most on the lovely old-style bracelet) and I also added some tech diagrams I found on my harddisk, enjoy:
    farm7.staticflickr.com/6120/6227120838_c27bc616a1_b.jpg

    farm1.staticflickr.com/86/370671406_38b14515dd_b.jpg

    farm4.staticflickr.com/3797/12118763566_439e599bdb_o.jpg

    farm4.staticflickr.com/3818/12118504944_aaafe7b0ac_o.jpg

    farm6.staticflickr.com/5517/12118108065_beaf31465b_o.jpg

    Groeten,

    Bob

  • Master
    24 Jan 2014, 9:34 p.m.

    Hello Bob,

    Thank you very much. The UTC is quite a handy travel watch, at the time completely not understood by me. The complication looks complex to me, but the way it operates is so simple: I saw it on a YouTube film by Clemens. Enjoy your beauty, its shape was about as special when it was presented as that of the 5002 Big Pilot, only at a more manageable size.

    Kind regards,
    Paul